Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jesus Espinoza-Rodriguez raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Lopez-Ortiz, 313 F.3d 225, 229-31 (5th Cir.2002), which held that an immigration judge’s failure to inform an alien of his eligibility for discretionary waiver of removal at his removal proceeding did not render the proceeding fundamentally unfair. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
189 F. App'x 333
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus ESPINOZA-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-20440
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 13, 2006.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Brent Evan Newton, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Espinoza-Rodriguez
189 F. App'x 333
Case Details
189 F. App'x 333
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!