188 So. 3d 911

Roger James SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D14-4029.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 24, 2016.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Young v. State, 141 So.3d 161, 165 (Fla.2013) (holding sufficiency of the evidence claim was not reviewable for fundamental error on appeal where defendant waived appellate review on- the specific issue of whether an uninhabitable building that had been undergoing renovation at the time of the break-in constituted a “dwelling” under the burglary statute, because defendant did not specifically argue at trial that the building was not a “dwelling” and the evidence established that, at the very least, defendant committed a burglary of a structure).

TORPY, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Smith v. State
188 So. 3d 911

Case Details

Name
Smith v. State
Decision Date
Mar 24, 2016
Citations

188 So. 3d 911

Jurisdiction
Florida

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!