63 Ohio St. 3d 135

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Meadows, Appellant.

[Cite as State v. Meadows (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 135.]

(No. 91-1080

Submitted February 11, 1992

Decided March 4, 1992.)

Arthur M. Ney, Jr., Prosecuting Attorney, and Leonard Kirschner, for appellee.

Randall M. Dana, Ohio Public Defender, and Wendie A. Gerus, for appellant.

The cause is affirmed on the authority of State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204. However, defendant-appellant may file for delayed reconsideration of his ineffectiveness-of-counsel claim in the Hamilton County Court of Appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Sweeney, J.,

dissents based on his dissent in State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204.

Wright and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

State v. Meadows
63 Ohio St. 3d 135

Case Details

Name
State v. Meadows
Decision Date
Mar 4, 1992
Citations

63 Ohio St. 3d 135

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!