540 F. App'x 186

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David SANJURJO, a/k/a Mickey, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-7037.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 24, 2013.

Decided: Sept. 27, 2013.

David Sanjurjo, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Sanjurjo appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sanjurjo, No. 3:98-cr-00338-REP-1 (E.D.Va. May 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this *187court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Sanjurjo
540 F. App'x 186

Case Details

Name
United States v. Sanjurjo
Decision Date
Sep 27, 2013
Citations

540 F. App'x 186

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!