*392Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Antonio Flores-Guzman raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
198 F. App'x 391
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Antonio FLORES-GUZMAN, also known as Marcos Antonio Flores-Solis, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-50413
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 8, 2006.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Philip J. Lynch, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Flores-Guzman
198 F. App'x 391
Case Details
198 F. App'x 391
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!