—The question in this case arises on a motion for a new trial, which questions the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the venue. The facts are identical with those in Christ v. State (1921), ante 56, 131 N. E. 820. The cause is thereby reversed on the authority of that case, with instructions to the trial court to sustain appellant’s motion for a new trial.
191 Ind. 704
Stianoff v. State of Indiana.
[No. 23,902.
Filed June 30, 1921.]
From Allen Circuit Court; Sol A. Wood, Judge.
Prosecution by the State of Indiana against Tiro Stianoff. From a judgment of conviction, the defendant appeals.
Reversed.
Ryan, Ryan & Aldrich, for appellant.
U. S. Lesh, Attorney-General, and Mrs. Edward Franklin White, for the state.
Stianoff v. State
191 Ind. 704
Case Details
191 Ind. 704
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!