97 F. App'x 148

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wilson MATUTE-PINEDA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-10466.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 14, 2004.

Anne E. Mosher, Esq., Christina M. Cabanillas, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Evo A. DeConcini U.S., Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Enrique R. Gonzales, Nogales, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM **

Wilson Matute-Pineda appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sen*149tence for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Matute-Pineda has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Matute-Pineda has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Matute-Pineda
97 F. App'x 148

Case Details

Name
United States v. Matute-Pineda
Decision Date
May 14, 2004
Citations

97 F. App'x 148

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!