The only question presented in this case is whether a contract between the bankrupt and Sanger Bros, was one of conditional sale or consignment. On the facts shown the District Court held the transaction to he a consignment. The judgment was right, and it is affirmed.
247 F. 1003
HAYNIE v. SANGER BROS.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
January 7, 1918.)
No. 3114.
Petition to Superintend and Revise from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas; Edward R. Meek, Judge. Petition by R. W. Ilaynie, trustee of Herman Winkler, bankrupt, against Sanger Bros., to superintend and revise judgment in a controversy between the parties.
Affirmed.
Dallas Scarborough, of Abilene, Tex., for petitioner.
J. D. Williamson, of Waco, Tex., for respondent.
Before WALKER and BATTS, Circuit Judges, and FOSTER, District Judge.
Haynie v. Sanger Bros.
247 F. 1003
Case Details
247 F. 1003
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!