We intended, by our former disposition of this matter, to grant leave to the appellant to reserve a proposed case on appeal and to procure it to be settled. We assume that this was not made clear to the learned justice who tried this case, because it appears that, on account of loches, he refused to settle the case submitted. The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, unless, in accord with such leave, a ease on appeal is made, served, settled, and printed, and the appeal is brought on for argument at the March term, 1902.
74 N.Y.S. 1142
POLYKRANAS, Respondent, v. KRAUSZ et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
January 17, 1902.)
Action by Eliza J. Polykranas against Bernath ICrausz and another.
O. J. Hoekstadter (Abraham B. Sehleimer, of counsel), for appellants.
David B. Cahn, for respondent.
Polykranas v. Krausz
74 N.Y.S. 1142
Case Details
74 N.Y.S. 1142
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!