4 Cust. Ct. 370

No. 43047.

Protests 373326-G, etc., of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel lace window curtains similar to those the subject of Billwiller v. United States (T. D. 44911) and filet articles like those passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Artificial flowers of the same character as those the subject of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Protests 373326-G of R. H. Macy & Co.
4 Cust. Ct. 370

Case Details

Name
Protests 373326-G of R. H. Macy & Co.
Decision Date
Jan 19, 1940
Citations

4 Cust. Ct. 370

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!