180 N.C. 674

HUTTON & BOURBONNAIS COMPANY v. WOOD HORTON, LARKIN HORTON, CHARLIE HORTON, and ROBERT WELCH.

(Filed 1 December, 1920.)

MotioN in tbe canse for judgment, according to tbe opinion of tbe Supreme Court, beard before Adams, J.; from Caldwell.

Tbe defendant tendered a judgment, wbicb tbe court refused to sign. From tbe judgment rendered tbe defendant appealed.

Gouncill & Yount and Marie Squires for plaintiff:

W. G. Newland and HaclceU & Qilreath for defendant.

Per, CueiaM.

Tbis cause was finally determined by tbis Court, Fall Term, 1919, and is reported 178 N. C., 548. Upon tbe coming down of tbe opinion, tbe defendant tendered a judgment, wbicb tbe court refused to sign. Tbe court rendered tbe following judgment:

Upon consideration of tbe certificate of tbe Supreme Court filed herein, it is therefore ordered that tbe former judgment be, and it is, affirmed, as to Wood Horton and Larkin Horton, and as to Charlie Horton and Robert Welch tbe action is dismissed. The said Charlie Horton and Robert Welch will recover their costs in tbe Superior Court.

W. J. Adams,

Judge Presiding.

We are of opinion that tbe judgment rendered by bis Honor is in strict conformity with tbe opinion of tbis Court.

Affirmed.

Hutton & Bourbonnais Co. v. Horton
180 N.C. 674

Case Details

Name
Hutton & Bourbonnais Co. v. Horton
Decision Date
Dec 1, 1920
Citations

180 N.C. 674

Jurisdiction
North Carolina

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!