622 So. 2d 302

Gail COYLE and Wendy Hicks v. Ann HARPER.

1911421.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 9, 1993.

*303Marylee Abele, Birmingham, for appellants.

Mark S. Boardman and Perryn S. Godbee of Porterfield, Harper & Mills, P.A., Birmingham, for appellee.

ALMON, Justice.

The plaintiffs, Gail Coyle and her daughter, Wendy Hicks, a minor, appeal from a summary judgment for the defendant, Ann Harper, in their action alleging negligent supervision. Hicks was a student in Harper’s class in Putnam Middle School. She was injured by another student in the classroom while Harper was monitoring the halls during or immediately after the change of classes. Harper was performing a discretionary function and is therefore immune from liability. Nance v. Matthews, 622 So.2d 297 (Ala.1993). The summary judgment for the defendant is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and HOUSTON, STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., concur.

Coyle v. Harper
622 So. 2d 302

Case Details

Name
Coyle v. Harper
Decision Date
Apr 9, 1993
Citations

622 So. 2d 302

Jurisdiction
Alabama

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!