100 Nev. 161 676 P.2d 811

GERALD DITTMANN, Appellant, v. SHARON DITTMANN, Respondent.

No. 14864

March 9, 1984

676 P.2d 811

B. Mahlon Brown, Las Vegas, for Appellant.

David Abbatangelo, Las Vegas, for Respondent.

OPINION

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion to modify a decree of divorce. Appellant filed an opening brief, but respondent has not filed an answering brief.

On February 17, 1984, we ordered respondent to file an answering brief or show cause why her failure to file a brief should not be treated as a confession of error pursuant to NRAP 31(c). In response to our order, respondent’s counsel notified this court that he “will not be filing an answering brief.”

Cause appearing, we elect to treat respondent’s conduct as a confession of error. NRAP 31(c); see Walport v. Walport, 98 Nev. 301, 646 P.2d 1215 (1982). Accordingly, the order of the district court is reversed, and this matter is remanded with instruction to modify the parties’ decree of divorce in accordancy with appellant’s motion filed below.

Dittmann v. Dittmann
100 Nev. 161 676 P.2d 811

Case Details

Name
Dittmann v. Dittmann
Decision Date
Mar 9, 1984
Citations

100 Nev. 161

676 P.2d 811

Jurisdiction
Nevada

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!