The plaintiff’s testimony certainly shows that he failed* to comply with the covenant in the guaranty, which provided that defendant should be notified, by postal card, if Ginns did not pay five dollars each week, on account of the goods sold; but the testimony also shows that defendant,, after Ginn’s default, waived that provision; therefore, the judgment was-* right, and must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
27 N.Y.S. 1133
WALDHEIM, Respondent, v. SONNENSTRAHL, Appellant.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
February 8, 1894.)
Action by Philip Waldheim against Abraham Sonnenstrahl.
Argued before EHRLICH, C. J., and VAN WYCK and FITZSIMONS, JJ..
Hayes & Greenbaum, for appellant.
Simpson & Werner, for respondent.
Waldheim v. Sonnenstrahl
27 N.Y.S. 1133
Case Details
27 N.Y.S. 1133
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!