In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated June 20, 1966, in favor of plaintiff upon a jury verdict and (2) an order of said court dated June 9, 1966 which denied their motions to set aside the verdict on the ground of excessiveness. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and new trial granted, limited to the issue of damages, without costs, unless, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, plaintiff shall serve and file a written stipulation consenting to reduce the amount of the verdict in her favor to $5,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Appeal from the order dismissed, without costs. An order denying a motion for a new trial, made only on the trial minutes, is not appealable. In any event, the foregoing disposition of the appeal from the judgment renders the appeal from the order academic. Beldoek, P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
29 A.D.2d 538
Kathryn Connolly, Respondent, v. Warwick Coaches, Inc., et al., Appellants.
Connolly v. Warwick Coaches, Inc.
29 A.D.2d 538
Case Details
29 A.D.2d 538
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!