180 So. 2d 651

Jose Perez VASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. DI LIDO HOTEL, Vichi, Inc. and F. I. C., an Administrative Agency, Respondents.

No. 34629.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 8, 1965.

David Goldman and Frank F. Cosgrove, Miami, for petitioner.

Carey, Terry, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Stephens, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J., Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 29, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

Petitioner’s application for attorney’s fees is denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Vasquez v. Di Lido Hotel
180 So. 2d 651

Case Details

Name
Vasquez v. Di Lido Hotel
Decision Date
Dec 8, 1965
Citations

180 So. 2d 651

Jurisdiction
Florida

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!