The judgment of the trial court, denying the writ of habeas corpus, is affirmed for the reasons so ably expressed by the opinion of that court reported in 234 F.Supp. 866.
337 F.2d 856
James Albert JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Harry C. TINSLEY, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, Appellee.
No. 7795.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
Oct. 22, 1964.
Richard J. Beacom, Westminster, Colo., for appellant.
Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., and John E. Bush, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and HILL and SETH, Circuit Judges.
Johnson v. Tinsley
337 F.2d 856
Case Details
337 F.2d 856
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!