126 F. Supp. 958

UNITED STATES of America v. Michael FERRO, a/k/a Michael Serra.

Crim. A. No. 9024.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

Sept. 22, 1954.

*959Simon S. Cohen, U. S. Atty., Harry W. Hultgren, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff.

Wallace R. Burke, Hartford, Conn., for defendant.

SMITH, Chief Judge.

In this wagering tax prosecution, defendant moves to dismiss on the ground that the purchase of the Special Tax Stamp within the month during which he commenced business is compliance with the Act, relying on Farmer v. U. S., 10 Cir., 1942, 128 F.2d 970.

The Farmer case, however, is a retail liquor dealer tax case, to which 26 U.S.C. § 3272, permitting payment by the end of the month of starting business is applicable.

26 U.S.C. § 3292, however, applies sections 3271, 3273(a), 3275, 3276, 3277, 3279 and 3280 to the Wagering Tax, but specifically provides that no other provision of subchapter B of chapter 27 (which includes section 3272) shall so extend or apply. In the absence of applicability -of section 3272, the provisions of 3271 plainly require purchase of the stamp before commencement of a wagering business.

The motion to dismiss the criminal information is denied.

United States v. Ferro
126 F. Supp. 958

Case Details

Name
United States v. Ferro
Decision Date
Sep 22, 1954
Citations

126 F. Supp. 958

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!