6 Cust. Ct. 960

Universal Foreign Service Co. et al. v. United States

No. 5266.

Entry No. 7742, etc.

Invoices dated Yokohama, Japan, April 12, 19'35, etc.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., May 1, 1935, etc.

(Decided May 19, 1941)

Lawrence & Tuttle (George R. Tuttle of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

Charles D. Lawrence, Acting Assistant Attorney General (Richard H. Welsh, special attorney), for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals to reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that as to certain items the issue is the same as in United States v. Nippon Dry Goods Co., Reap. Dec. 5006; that the appraised values less certain additions correctly represent the export values, and that there were no higher foreign values.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the rayon wearing apparel and the rayon footwear covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser, less any amounts added by the importer by reason of the so-called Japanese consumption tax. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Universal Foreign Service Co. v. United States
6 Cust. Ct. 960

Case Details

Name
Universal Foreign Service Co. v. United States
Decision Date
May 19, 1941
Citations

6 Cust. Ct. 960

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!