441 F. App'x 151

Curlina SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST SUN MANAGEMENT INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11-1349.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 28, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 1, 2011.

Curlina Smith, Appellant Pro Se. William H. Floyd, III, Nexsen Pruet, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curlina Smith appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her employment discrimination action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T] he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on September 13, 2010. The notice of appeal was filed on April 8, 2011. Because Smith failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma*152terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Smith v. First Sun Management Inc.
441 F. App'x 151

Case Details

Name
Smith v. First Sun Management Inc.
Decision Date
Aug 1, 2011
Citations

441 F. App'x 151

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!