No opinion. Remittitur amended so as to declare, “ that the judgment be affirmed as to all the defendants so far as it affects the part of the premises owned by the Lamb heirs, and that it be reversed as to the part of the premises owned by Clarissa Waterman,” and in other respects that the motion be denied. Aff’g in part and rev’g in part, 55 St. Rep. 1.
65 N.Y. St. Rptr. 867
Gilbert Murdock et al., Resp’ts, v. Harriet Robinson, App’lt.
March 19, 1895.
E. W. Harris, for the motion; Lynn J. Arnold, opposed.
Murdock v. Robinson
65 N.Y. St. Rptr. 867
Case Details
65 N.Y. St. Rptr. 867
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!