Basil Uzoma Onyido seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to sua sponte reopen and reconsider his 1999 deportation. See In re Onyido, 22 I. & N. Dec. 552 (BIA 1999). This was the second such motion Onyido filed in 2013, almost 14 years after he was deported. The BIA denied the motion as both time-barred and number-barred, regardless of how it was *489construed. The BIA also found no exceptional circumstances to justify reopening, and it noted that relief was barred by Onyido’s deportation. In his petition for review, Onyido challenges his deportation and the underlying aggravated felony conviction.
Onyido invoked the BIA’s authority to sua sponte reopen proceedings under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2. Section 1003.2(a) affords an Immigration Judge (IJ) or the BIA “complete discretion” to deny a motion to reopen, and we therefore have “no legal standard by which to judge” such a decision. Ramos-Bonilla v. Mukasey, 543 F.3d 216, 220 (5th Cir.2008). We accordingly lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision. See id.; Enriquez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 246, 249-50 (5th Cir.2004) (citing other circuits’ decisions holding the same). Onyido’s petition for review is DISMISSED. All motions are DENIED.