Per Curiam.
The papers submitted upon the defendant’s application for leave to appeal to the *573court of appeals, fail to show that a question of law is involved, which ought to be reviewed by the court of appeals.
Before Curtis, Ch. J., and Sedgwick and Freedman, JJ.
Decided June 18, 1880.
Motion by defendant for leave to appeal to the court of appeals.
Thomas E. Byrne, for the motion.
C. E. Tracy, opposed.
Per Curiam.
The papers submitted upon the defendant’s application for leave to appeal to the *573court of appeals, fail to show that a question of law is involved, which ought to be reviewed by the court of appeals.
14 Jones and Spencer's Super. Ct. Rep. 572
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!