The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached •and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a ¡stipulation of facts. Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, and following the case of United States v. Nippon Dry Goods Co., Reap. Dec. 5006, I find and hold the proper dutiable export value of the parasols covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser less any amounts added by the importers by reason of the so-called Japanese consumption tax, and that there was no higher foreign value at or about the dates of exportation. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
7 Cust. Ct. 558
Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. (Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc.), et al. v. United States
No. 5471.
Invoices dated Yokohama, Japan, March 26, 1936, etc.
Entered at Seattle, Wash., April 8, 1936, etc.
Entry No. 4755, etc.
(Decided October 20, 1941)
Siegel & Mandell (Samuel T. Siegel óf counsel) for the plaintiffs.
Charles D. Lawrence, Acting Assistant Attorney- General (Daniel I, Auster, ¡special attorney), for the defendant.
Frank P. Dow Co. v. United States
7 Cust. Ct. 558
Case Details
7 Cust. Ct. 558
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!