106 Tex. Crim. 140

Bernice Luck v. The State.

No. 10656.

Delivered February 9, 1927.

*141The opinion states the case.

No brief filed for appellant. E. T. Adams, County Attorney of Somervell County.

Sam D. Stinson, State’s Attorney, and Robert M. Lyles, Assistant State’s Attorney, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Drunkenness in a public place is the offense; punishment fixed at a fine of eighty-five dollars.

Appellant was tried in the Justice Court and convicted, the jury assessing against him a fine of seventy-five dollars. On appeal to the County Court and trial de novo he was again convicted and his punishment fixed at a fine of eighty-five dollars. His appeal to this court is unauthorized by reason of Art. 53, C. C. P., 1925, which reads thus:

“The Court, of Criminal Appeals shall have appellate jurisdiction co-extensive with the limits of the State in all criminal cases. This article shall not be construed as to embrace any case which has been appealed from any inferior court to the county court, or county court at law, in which the fine imposed by the county court or county court at law shall not exceed one hundred dollars.”

See also Verga v. State, 280 S. W. 776.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Luck v. State
106 Tex. Crim. 140

Case Details

Name
Luck v. State
Decision Date
Feb 9, 1927
Citations

106 Tex. Crim. 140

Jurisdiction
Texas

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!