177 Ill. App. 25

George D. Phelps for use of Harry S. Mecartney, Appellant, v. City of Chicago, Appellee.

Gen. No. 16,877.

Appeals and errors—former appeal. Where a case comes before court of review the second time and the questions involved are the same, the former decision is binding and the judgment is affirmed.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Jesse A. Baldwin, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1910.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 27, 1913.

George A. Mason and Edgar R. Hart, for appellee; Edward J. Brundage, of counsel.

Oliver & Mecartney and Enoch J. Price, for appellant.

Mr. Presiding Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case was before this court on a former appeal and the opinion therein is reported in 150 Ill. App. 281. The situation is the same as that in Mecartney v. City of Chicago, ante, 23, in which an opinion is this day filed. The questions involved were decided on said former appeal against the appellant, and the law there announced is the law of the case on this appeal, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Phelps ex rel. Mecartney v. City of Chicago
177 Ill. App. 25

Case Details

Name
Phelps ex rel. Mecartney v. City of Chicago
Decision Date
Jan 27, 1913
Citations

177 Ill. App. 25

Jurisdiction
Illinois

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!