88 Tex. Crim. 155

Robert Stroud v. The State.

No. 5973.

Decided November 17, 1920.

Misdemeanor Theft—Charge of Court.

In misdemeanors, a charge of the court is not required unless it is requested, and the record not setting out the charge of the court, and the proceedings in other respects being regular, the conviction is sustained.

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. One, of Harris County. Tried below before the Honorable Geo. Sears.

Appeal from a conviction of a misdemeanor theft. Penalty, one year confinement in the county jail.

*156The opinion states the case.

No brief on file for appellant.

Alvin M. Owsley, Assistant Attorney General, and E. T. Branch, for the State.

Cited Wagner v. State, 188 S. W. Rep., 1001.

MORROW, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of misdemeanor theft, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the county jaib for one year.

By complaint and information regular m form and substance the appellant was charged with theft, and a verdict and judgment of conviction rendered. The charge of the court is not set out in the record, but in a misdemeanor case none is required unless requested. The facts are not before us, nor do we find any bills of exceptions. We must presume the trial regular, and the verdict supported by the evidence. An affirmance results.

Affirmed.

Stroud v. State
88 Tex. Crim. 155

Case Details

Name
Stroud v. State
Decision Date
Nov 17, 1920
Citations

88 Tex. Crim. 155

Jurisdiction
Texas

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!