1 Alaska Fed. 905 118 F. 1019

118 F. 1019

PIPER v. CASHELL et al.

No. 853.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

1902.

H. E. Shields and C. S. Hannum, for plaintiff in error.

Samuel Knight, for defendants in error.

*906PER CURIAM.

In the above-entitled cause, counsel for the defendants in error having called the attention of the court to the fact that counsel who signed the brief for the plaintiff in error therein are not members of the bar of the circuit court of appeals, thereupon the court held that briefs which were not signed by counsel whose qualifications were consistent with the requirements of rule 7 of the court (31 C.C.A. cxliv, 90 F. cxliv) would not be considered by the court.

Piper v. Cashell
1 Alaska Fed. 905 118 F. 1019

Case Details

Name
Piper v. Cashell
Decision Date
Jan 1, 1970
Citations

1 Alaska Fed. 905

118 F. 1019

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!