104 N.Y.S. 1150

WINOGRAD, Appellant, v. EPSTEIN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

May 10, 1907.)

Action by Joseph Winograd against Samuel Epstein.

PER CURIAM.

If there was a breach of the contract by the defendant, the plaintiff was entitled to recover the payments made and the difference between the contract price and the value of the goods at the time and place of delivery. The payment of $50 was conceded, and the evidence that the goods were worth $50 more than the contract price was not disputed. It was therefore error to give judgment for only the sum of $50. Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.

Winograd v. Epstein
104 N.Y.S. 1150

Case Details

Name
Winograd v. Epstein
Decision Date
May 10, 1907
Citations

104 N.Y.S. 1150

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!