The question was certified to the Judge, [BLATCHEOED, District Judge,] who sustained the decision of the register.
In re Altenheim 1 F. Cas. 584, 1 Ben. 431, 1 N. B. R. 85, Bankr. Reg. Supp, 19, 6 Int. Rev. Rec. 117
Case No. 268.
In re ALTENHEIM.
[1 Ben. 431;1 1 N. B. R. 85; Bankr. Reg. Supp, 19; 6 Int. Rev. Rec. 117.]
District Court, S. D. New York.
Sept. 25, 1867.
Appearance — Protest.
A person named as a creditor in a bankrupt’s schedule, but who does not appear in person or by attorney duly constituted, and has not proved any debt, cannot put on file a protest against being named as a creditor.
In bankruptcy. In this case, at the first meeting of creditors, an attorney appeared on behalf of a party named in the bankrupt’s schedule as a creditor by virtue of a mortgage on certain real estate of the bankrupt, executed by a former owner thereof, and asked leave to put on file a protest on his part against being named as a creditor. The bankrupt objected, and the register held that, as the party did not appear in person or by attorney duly constituted, and had not *585proved any debt, the paper could not be filed.
Case Details
1 F. Cas. 584
1 Ben. 431
1 N. B. R. 85
Bankr. Reg. Supp, 19
6 Int. Rev. Rec. 117
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!