638 F. App'x 240

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Anthony CORNWELL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-7408.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 29, 2016.

Decided: March 15, 2016.

Michael Anthony Cornwell, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Edwards, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Kenneth Michel Smith, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

*241Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Anthony Cornwell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(e)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cornwell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Cornwell
638 F. App'x 240

Case Details

Name
United States v. Cornwell
Decision Date
Mar 15, 2016
Citations

638 F. App'x 240

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!