The complaint alleges, and plaintiff’s evidence establishes, the fact that his employment was for a specific period. That was the issue submitted to the jury, and, although this issue was denied in defendant’s answer, and also upon the trial, the jury believed plaintiff’s version of the question in controversy, as they had a right to do. Under the circumstances, it was immaterial whether there was a custom of giving and taking two weeks’ notice, if such a custom existed, and it certainly could not offset the specific contract made by the parties hereto.
The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.