320 F. App'x 652

Maria Guadalupe Garcia ROCHEL, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-74746.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*653Submitted March 18, 2008.*

Filed March 26, 2009.

Richard Clay Mendez, Esquire, Law Offices of Mendez & Lopez, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Jeffery R. Leist, Trial, John D. Williams, Esquire, Stacy Stiffel Paddack, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Guadalupe Garcia Rochel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision dismissing her appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal, based on her failure to establish an exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her United States citizen children and legal permanent resident father. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that petitioner failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B); Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 979 (9th Cir.2009). Petitioner’s contention that the Board failed to adequately consider and weigh all evidence of hardship does not raise a colorable due process claim. Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

Rochel v. Holder
320 F. App'x 652

Case Details

Name
Rochel v. Holder
Decision Date
Mar 26, 2009
Citations

320 F. App'x 652

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!