101 Ga. App. 865

37833.

TILLMAN v. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT.

Felton, Chief Judge.

“Where a proceeding in rem is brought to condemn property for a public use under the provisions of Chapter 36-11 of the Code as amended by the act of 1938, tender of the amount awarded by the assessors to the apparent or ostensible owner of such property is not a condition precedent to the condemnor’s right to pay the award into the .registry of the court and enter an appeal to a jury.” State Highway Dept. v. Hendrix, 215 Ga. 821 (113 S. E. 2d 761); *866 Tillman v. State Highway Dept., 216 Ga. 70 (114 S. E. 2d 537.)

Decided June 6, 1960

Rehearing denied June 21, 1960.

Tillman & Brice, B. Lamar Tillman, for plaintiff in error.

Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, Paul Miller, E. J. Summerour, Assistant Attomeys-General, W. J. Gibbons, contra.

In this case the motion by the condemnee to dismiss the State Highway Department’s appeal on the sole ground that the amount of the assessor’s award was not first paid or tendered to the condemnee was correctly overruled. The motion to dismiss the appeal did not include the ground that the amount of the award was not properly paid into the registry of the court. The second case cited above is the answer of the Supreme Court to a certified question by this court in this case.

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols and Bell, JJ., concur.

Tillman v. State Highway Department
101 Ga. App. 865

Case Details

Name
Tillman v. State Highway Department
Decision Date
Jun 6, 1960
Citations

101 Ga. App. 865

Jurisdiction
Georgia

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!