468 F. App'x 776

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro CHIHUAHUA-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-10251.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 21, 2012.*

Filed Feb. 22, 2012.

Sarah Elizabeth Dejong, USPX-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Florence Bruemmer, Law Offices of Florence M. Bruemmer, PC, Anthem, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM **

Pedro Chihuahua-Rodríguez appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), with a sentencing enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Chihuahua-Rodriguez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Chihuahua-Rodríguez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Chihuahua-Rodriguez
468 F. App'x 776

Case Details

Name
United States v. Chihuahua-Rodriguez
Decision Date
Feb 22, 2012
Citations

468 F. App'x 776

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!