585 F. App'x 75

Wayne RESPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sgt. T. SIRES; Officer Bennett, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 14-6404.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 21, 2014.

Decided: Oct. 23, 2014.

Wayne Resper, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Resper appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Resper v. Sires, No. 8:12-cv-02816-PJM (D.Md. Feb. 12 & Apr. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Resper v. Sires
585 F. App'x 75

Case Details

Name
Resper v. Sires
Decision Date
Oct 23, 2014
Citations

585 F. App'x 75

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!