883 S.W.2d 112

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Gary SILINZY, Appellant.

No. 64086.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Sept. 13, 1994.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J. and CRIST and CRANDALL, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after a jury convicted him of first degree assault- and armed criminal action. We affirm.

Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by summary order. Rule 30.-25(b). A memorandum setting forth the rea*113sons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

State v. Silinzy
883 S.W.2d 112

Case Details

Name
State v. Silinzy
Decision Date
Sep 13, 1994
Citations

883 S.W.2d 112

Jurisdiction
Missouri

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!