402 A.2d 1300

STATE of Maine v. Walter J. BROCHU.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

July 3, 1979.

John R. Atwood (orally), Dist. Atty., Patricia Goodridge Worth, Intern, Rockland, for plaintiff.

Edward B. Miller, Rockland (orally), for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C. J., and POMER-OY, WERNICK and GODFREY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged by complaint with three motor vehicle violations,1 accorded a consolidated jury trial, and found guilty of each offense. Following the entries of judgments of conviction, the defendant has appealed. Despite his failure to move for judgments of acquittal pursuant to either Rule 29(a) or (b), M.R.Crim.P., or to move for a new trial pursuant to Rule *130133, M.R.Crim.P., defendant’s only argument on appeal is premised on the claimed insufficiency of the evidence. Our review, therefore, is limited to searching the record for “obvious errors or defects affecting [the defendant’s] substantial rights.” Rule 52(b), M.R.Crim.P.; State v. Boyer, Me., 392 A.2d 41, 42 (1978). We have done so and find no such error.2

The entries are:

Appeals denied.

Judgments affirmed.

DELAHANTY and NICHOLS, JJ., did not sit.

State v. Brochu
402 A.2d 1300

Case Details

Name
State v. Brochu
Decision Date
Jul 3, 1979
Citations

402 A.2d 1300

Jurisdiction
Maine

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!