132 Tex. Crim. 63

E. G. Gammill v. The State.

No. 18847.

Delivered March 3, 1937.

*64The opinion states the case.

E. G. Gammill, in person.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— Forgery is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life.

The appellant was convicted under the provisions of Art. 63, P. C., commonly referred to as the “Habitual Criminal Statute” which provides that one who has three times been convicted of a felony less than capital, shall, on the third conviction, be imprisoned for life in the state penitentiary.

The primary offense charged was that of passing the following instrument alleged to be a forgery:

The evidence shows that the appellant, in the presence of the person to whom he was passing the instrument, forged the name of “E. M. Davis” as an endorsement thereon. There is no proof that the signature of “J. W. Shaw”, the alleged maker of the instrument, was a forgery. In the absence of an allegation in the indictment that the signature of “E. M. Davis,” the endorser, was forged, it follows that such was not sufficient to establish the instrument as a forgery.

The same question was before this court in the case of Gam*65mill v. State, No. 18,800, opinion delivered February 24, 1937 (Reported on page 43 this volume). Upon the reason and authority of that ease, the judgment in the present instance is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Gammill v. State
132 Tex. Crim. 63

Case Details

Name
Gammill v. State
Decision Date
Mar 3, 1937
Citations

132 Tex. Crim. 63

Jurisdiction
Texas

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!