163 F. App'x 583

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mark Anthony JARVIS, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-10144.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 9, 2006.*

Decided Jan. 19, 2006.

Thomas E. Flynn, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff — Appellee.

Tara I. Allen, Esq., Sacramento, CA, for Defendant — Appellant.

Before: HUG, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Mark Anthony Jarvis appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to making a false statement on a bankruptcy petition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152(3). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Jarvis contends that the case should be remanded for a correction of the written judgment to conform with the district court’s oral pronouncement of his sentence. We disagree. Because the oral pronouncement was ambiguous, the unambiguous written judgment controls. See Fenner v. United States Parole Commission, 251 F.3d 782, 787 (9th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Jarvis
163 F. App'x 583

Case Details

Name
United States v. Jarvis
Decision Date
Jan 19, 2006
Citations

163 F. App'x 583

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!