129 Ohio St. (n.s.) 463

Sugarman et al. v. The State of Ohio.

(No. 25318

Decided May 1, 1935.)

Mr. Ray T. Miller and Messrs. Silber S Soltz, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Frank T. Cullitan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Frederick W. Frey, for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Jones, J., not participating.

Sugarman v. State
129 Ohio St. (n.s.) 463

Case Details

Name
Sugarman v. State
Decision Date
May 1, 1935
Citations

129 Ohio St. (n.s.) 463

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!