MEMORANDUM **
Maricela Arceo-Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s *572decision denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.
The agency did not abuse its discretion by denying Arceo-Garcia’s motion to reopen as untimely because it was filed over 13 years after the agency’s final order of removal, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7), and Arceo-Garcia failed to establish the due diligence required for equitable tolling, see Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 897; Singh v. Gonzales, 491 F.3d 1090, 1095-97 (9th Cir.2007).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.