Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, upon the ground that negligence, freedom from contributory negligence and damages were questions of fact for the jury. All concur, except Edgcomb, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance on the ground that the infant was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Present — Clark, Sears, Crouch, Taylor and Edgcomb, JJ.
225 A.D. 730
James Crowley, Appellant, v. Rochester Swiss Laundry Company, Respondent.*
Crowley v. Rochester Swiss Laundry Co.
225 A.D. 730
Case Details
225 A.D. 730
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!