8 Or. App. 166 493 P.2d 186

Submitted on appellant’s brief January 24,

reversed February 4, 1972

DAVID, Appellant, v. DAVID, Respondent.

(No. 351-212)

493 P2d 186

Lester L. Rawls, Portland, for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Foley and Thornton, Judges.

*167PEE CUEIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court granting defendant’s motion to reduce child support payments previously set by the court in the original decree of divorce in accordance with the parties’ child support and property settlement agreement. The plaintiff contends that the record conclusively shows that the only change of circumstance is that the income of the defendant was higher at the time of the hearing on the defendant’s motion to reduce support payments than his income at the time the decree was entered.

The defendant has not filed a brief. In the absence of a brief from defendant we will not search the record, and assume that the plaintiff’s recitations as to the state of the record are correct.

Eeversed.

David v. David
8 Or. App. 166 493 P.2d 186

Case Details

Name
David v. David
Decision Date
Feb 4, 1972
Citations

8 Or. App. 166

493 P.2d 186

Jurisdiction
Oregon

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!