1 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 325

Present, The Honourable Arthur Middleton, Esq. President; William Bull, Alexander Skene, Charles Hart, Benjamin Schenghing, Benjamin DeLa-Conseillere, Esquires of his Majesties Council for Executing the Office of Chancellour.

Richard Baker Complainant v. John Moore, Defendant

On Motion this day being made by Mr. Hamilton Council for the plan-tiff to have the Bill of Complaint read as likewise the Answer and Demurer of the Defendant the Council for the plantiff pleads that the Defendant has been guilty of Usury; Mr. Whitaker and Mr. Allein Council for the Defendant Alledges that no Man is Obliged to answer to what will lay him open to any Penalty at Common Law, and denys that they have been guilty of any Usury, The Cause being Maturely Considered and Debated

It is the Opinion of this Court that the Defendants Demurrer is good and its therefore Allowed of and the Bill is dismissed.

Intr.

J. Skene Register

Baker v. Moore
1 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 325

Case Details

Name
Baker v. Moore
Decision Date
Aug 12, 1726
Citations

1 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 325

Jurisdiction
South Carolina

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!