46 Okla. 483 149 P. 158

ISAAC et al. v. LEE.

No. 4001.

Opinion Filed May 18, 1915.

(149 Pac. 158.)

CONTRACT WITH ATTORNEY — Indians. Syllabus the same as in No. 3999, Jack Postoak v. Albert J. Lee, ante, 149 Pac. 155.

(Syllabus by Galbraith, C.)

Error from District Court, Carter County; 8. if. Bussell, Judge.

Action by Albert J. Lee against King Isaac and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

Affirmed.

Wm. J. Gregg, John B. Meserm, and 'Carter 'Smith, Asst. IJ. S. Atty., for plaintiffs- in error.

*484 Onice & Onice, for defendant in error.

GALBRAITH, C.

This action is based upon a note and contract for the same amount and of similar character as that considered in No. 3999, Jack Postoak against Albert J. Lee, 149 Pac. 155, decided this day, and the law of that case controls this.

We, therefore, recommend that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

By' the Court: It is so ordered.

Isaac v. Lee
46 Okla. 483 149 P. 158

Case Details

Name
Isaac v. Lee
Decision Date
May 18, 1915
Citations

46 Okla. 483

149 P. 158

Jurisdiction
Oklahoma

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!