226 A.D. 682

John C. Herrmann, Appellant, v. Bernard Schlenger, Respondent, and Lillian S. Schlenger, Defendant.

Order, in so far as it denies motion to strike out the first separate and distinct defense in the second amended answer and to dismiss the counterclaim, reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion in these respects granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to respondent to plead over within ten days. Said defense is insufficient in law, and the counterclaim does not state facts sufficient to eon-., *683stitute a cause of action. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Seeger, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.

Herrmann v. Schlenger
226 A.D. 682

Case Details

Name
Herrmann v. Schlenger
Decision Date
Mar 1, 1929
Citations

226 A.D. 682

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!