Todd Feurtado appeals three district court orders, the first denying relief on his *106motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000), the second denying his motion for a certificate of appealability, and the third denying his amended motion for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Feurtado, Nos. CR-95-669; CA-99-350 (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2000, Dec. 1, 2000 & Jan. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.