ORDER STRIKING MOTION FOR ORDER OF SURRENDER
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon two documents submitted to the Clerk for filing by Thomas and Gloria Womack. The first, a “Motion for Order of Surrender,” *705was filed on December 4, 1992. The second document is entitled “Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Supporting Documentation and Order” and is dated January 7, 1993. The application appears to be an altered form used in the district court. This document was not filed by the clerk due to an Order signed by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas, on December 10, 1992, prohibiting the clerk from accepting any papers filed by Thomas Womack without prior written authorization of the Court.1 That document is made an exhibit to this Order and will not be formally filed by the Clerk. The motion states in full:
1. That the Debtor Allison Warehouse and Transfer Co.. Inc ETAL, has billed the said Thomas Womack, Jr and Gloria Womack as a debtor for moving and storage fees which Debtor illegally created by unlawfully entering their home without any type of legal authority; in violative of a United States Bankruptcy Court order and in violative of the Bankruptcy Stay from Chapter 13, Case number 88-42637 S. (See attached bill and Court Order)
2. That Thomas Womack, Jr. and Gloria Womack has not claimed a debt against Debtor, but debtor has acted premature by listing the said Thomas Womack, Jr. and Gloria Womack as Creditors.
3. That debtor’s claim of a debt to the said Womacks is moot, and the stay should be lifted from their name and Debtor ordered to return all of their properties which has been illegally held since August 9, 1990.
4. That Debtor’s action is pretaining to properties that it has illegally .deprived the Womacks of, keeping them under extreme hardship and not pre-taining to a debt owed to the Womacks.
WHEREFORE, Thomas Womack, Jr and Gloria Womack pray for a order granting an Order of surrender in regards to all of their properties that were removed from their home by debtor and an order granting Thomas and Gloria Womack relief from the stay, and all other just and proper relief.
(Emphasis and errors in original.)
The Motion for Surrender will be stricken as completely unintelligible.2 The Court cannot even determine from this motion whether the Womacks claim to be a creditor or debtor of the debtor corporation. They appear to deny and assert either status. The Court further notes that the Womacks have failed to state an address to which Orders of the Court or responsive pleadings may be sent.3
*706Were the Court to consider an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, it would be denied. First, there is no proceeding pending by the Womacks which requires expenditure of funds by the Wom-acks. Secondly, the application is only slightly less incoherent than the Motion for Order of Surrender, addressed above. The minimal coherence in the application is due to the fact that it is a form application which makes certain statements for the application. Finally, the applicants have failed to satisfy the standards of the statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), such that this Court, in its discretion would deny the application on the merits. See generally In re Clark, 86 B.R. 593 (Bankr.E.D.Ark.1988) (standards for in forma pauperis applications).
Based upon the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the Motion for Order of Surrender, filed by Thomas and Gloria Womack on December 4, 1992, is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.