107 F. App'x 95

Marie L. SOWDER, Executrix of the Estate of Tony R. Sowder, Deceased; Tony R. Sowder, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-35112.

D.C. No. CV 02-00136 WFN.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 6, 2004.

Decided Aug. 18, 2004.

James J. Workland, Esq., Gary C. Randall, Esq., Workland & Witherspoon, PLLC, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

James A. McDevitt, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, Youngna Lee, Jonathan S. Cohen, Esq., Ellen P. Delsole, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: HUG, TASHIMA, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

The United States appeals an order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff/Appellee Marie Sowder, executrix of the estate of Tony R. *96Sowder. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand.

The district court denied the government’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f) motion seeking discovery regarding the decedent’s intent.1 We agree with the government that it should have the opportunity to conduct discovery in order to rebut the affidavits submitted by the estate. See Wash. Rev.Code § 11.108.010(4) (defining a marital deduction gift as “a gift intended to qualify for the marital deduction as indicated by a preponderance of the evidence including the governing instrument and extrinsic evidence whether or not the governing instrument is found to be ambiguous”). We therefore reverse the judgment of the district court and remand to the district court to permit the government to conduct discovery and to make a factual finding on the testator’s intent.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Sowder v. United States
107 F. App'x 95

Case Details

Name
Sowder v. United States
Decision Date
Aug 18, 2004
Citations

107 F. App'x 95

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!